Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> During some of the discussions lately on debian-devel another usage of
>> the changelog has risen interest:
>> * New upstream release (closes: #123, #124, #125)
>> This has also raised some discussions. The thing is this: If #123,
>> #124 and #125 aren't just "New upstream version available" bugreports
>> then quite some people dislike this behavior. It shouldn't be too much
>> hazzle for the maintainer to rewrite this as follows:
> I strongly disagree with your view. Please respond to my points
> that have been raised previously rather than repeating this dogma.
[...]
Hello,
Could we pretty please let this rest? Both side's arguments have
already been reiterated a thousand times in the Bug#193497-thread.
cu and- it was difficult to keep myself from really responding and
restarting the thread, I hope it pays off. - dreas
