Colin Watson wrote: > I don't see that this would particularly benefit anyone. In this > particular case, removing the packages from testing won't help them get > in any quicker, so people running testing will still be without them. > Keeping them in gives us a useful marker of what work needs to be done > following the perl upgrade, IMHO.
It would help keep testing closer to the goal of something that's "always releasable". It would also prevent testing users from confusion when they try to install one of the broken packages for the first time. -- see shy jo
pgpknqr8yQpsz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
