Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> Come on, we already support 11 or so arches officially, and a bunch of > other unofficially, surelly this would not be so expensive for us. IMHO it's better to be coherent with the ARCH name. If i386 arch is no more supported, let's go to the next generation until the gcc support will drop the i486. -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation.
