* Rene Engelhard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030602 01:05]: > > However, it really might be better to put a longer statement into > > changelog. _But_ it's certainly much worse to re-open a really closed > > bug than to make a too short changelog entry. (BTW: You should really
> a wrongly closed... (whithout explanation what the fix was; the Was the bug still there? No. So it was right to close the bug despite the fact that _you_ didn't like the changelog-style. > > make cleaner why changing of the compiler closes the Bug 194555. The > > situation there is fare worse than here. You shouldn't flame until > > you're perfekt.) > aha. You say me I should respect the decision and you don't. > *sigh* I didn't reopen your bug report. And - I would never spoken about that here unless you bashed a debian maintainer here and reopend a really closed bug. > I actually am really busy with other Debian and RL things... Perhaps you just shouldn't try to enforce your point of view. That would make it easier. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
