Chris Leishman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I care about security in testing, and I believe others do too. But I > don't think the process should be the same as with stable releases. > Testing should not become another psudo stable distribution....it's > for testing. So I don't think security management needs to be > anywhere near as comprehensive.
Why not? Testing would be my personal choice for running a desktop (or laptop) Linux, were I not otherwise involved with Debian development. The only bad thing is the non-existent security (I could live with occasional critical bug but the level of critical bugs in unstable is too much to bear for most users). There are, however, some pre-plans afoot regarding that (more or less running the same process as with stable, of course with different people responsible). -- * Behind every successful man is a woman, behind her is his wife. * * (Groucho Marx) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer *
