Hi Chinput can use any of libpng2 or libpng3, it just need a rebuild. -- Yu Guanghui <ygh at dlut.edu.cn> Network Center Dalian University of Technology, China
引用 "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > > I'd like to solicit opinions about what to do with > imlib-linked-against-libpng3. > > Until August 2002, the Debian imlib packages were linked with libpng2. > Even after libpng3 was released in early 2002, imlib remained linked > with the older libpng2. This was done to retain the ABI of imlib, > especially the ABI of the GNOME version, gdk-imlib. > > Imlib is more-or-less dormant upstream. However, in late August, I > was under the impression that upstream imlib was going to release a > new version (with new SONAME) that would be linked with libpng3. In > anticipation of that, I introduced imlib2/imlib-dev into Debian but > filed a Grave bug against it to keep it from moving to testing. > > It is still not in testing. > > I no longer believe that upstream will release any new versions of > imlib and I plan to ask that imlib2 be removed from the archive. I > don't want to change the current imlib1 linkage since imlib is pretty > much dormant and probably on its way out. > > There are six packages currently linked against imlib2: > > chinput > fnlib > kdegraphics > mgp > picturebook > wallp > > I'm not sure whether they strictly require png3 or whether they could > simply be rebuilt with imlib1 and libpng2. In the past, however, some > KDE folks have explicitly requested imlib+png3. > > What would be the best way to accomodate such a request? I can > imagine introducing a new package of imlib linked with libpng3. But > since it has to use the same SOVERSION as the current imlib1, it would > have to conflict with imlib1. Each individual admin could then choose > to use imlib+png2 or to use imlib+png3. However, each choice would > have its own set of incompatible programs so this option doesn't > appeal to me. > > Another option is to drop the idea of imlib+png3. The six packages > mentioned above would then have to build either with png2 or somehow > incorporate imlib into their source build. For the maintainers of the > six packages: is that feasible? > > -Steve > > > ------------------------------------------------- 欢迎使用大连理工大学web邮件系统: http://mail.dlut.edu.cn
