>> On 18 Apr 2003 11:15:50 -0400,
>> Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> There's other use cases too, but if we're not supporting the two
> big ones above, we have completely failed. I hope this makes
> things clearer. There *is* a problem, and we need to fix it.
I think more than just these use cases, we need to support the
invariant that user changes in /etc/ are scrosanct, and we should not
have screipts determining that they know better and blow awqay the
changes.
Indeed, if the users choices break the installation of the
package, so be it.
After all, no one has written code into rm to prevent rm -rf /
either. though that is inherently a dangerous operation.
manoj
--
While Europe's eye is fix'd on mighty things, The fate of empires and
the fall of kings; While quacks of State must each produce his plan,
And even children lisp the Rights of Man; Amid this mighty fuss just
let me mention, The Rights of Woman merit some attention. Robert
Burns, Address on "The Rights of Woman", 26/10 1792
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
