On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:19:17PM -0400, Elie Rosenblum wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:16:11AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > Technically it wasn't. The upload is still in the DELAYED queue, which > > is really just a convenient automated way of saying "I'll NMU this > > package in <n> days if I don't hear anything", with the added bonus of > > allowing the maintainer to poke at it and see exactly what would go in > > in the absence of a maintainer upload. I usually explain this when using > > the delayed queue. > > I assume you also submit a bug.
Quite. > Do you generally do this without leaving a bug for a few days first? In the case of the perl transition I've been given to understand by the actions of other developers that the -devel-announce post on 31st July was enough. Otherwise no. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
