Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,
> Hi.. out of curiosity, does anyone know what's keeping the new libusb out of > testing? I can't find anything useful in update_excuses.html and I can't > make sense of the lines in update_output.txt. The (obvious) problems were : - sane-backends/sane-frontends RC bugs - gphoto2 not building on arm - kdegraphics not building on arm The hidden problems were : - pencam depending on libusb0 on m68k and sparc (bad build-deps) - libgpio depending on libusb0 on sparc (bad build-deps) [...] > Just wondering what remains to be done to let libusb 1:0.1.5-3 in. Nothing. Just wait. Binary NMUs for pencam and libgpio are in incoming, dinstall will pick them up in a couple of hours. After this, we should be done with this problem. JB. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
