On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:22:07PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > indeed, I would not like to see people modifying my points of view and > redistributing saying that's what I think, you see So if I rewrite charsets (7) (which I'm considering), I should make sure that it's under an invariant license so that nobody can say I think ISO-2022-INT is a good idea? (Believe me, there's as much heat on that subject as there is on many other religious issue in computing.) Even if I were to do so, it still wouldn't stop anyone from writing other documents and putting my name on them, or claiming that I support something I don't in other documents.
If you don't want people putting words in your mouth in some POV piece, just put on the bottom "I'd prefer you didn't modify this, and if you do, please clearly seperate your opinion from what I wrote. Thanks." > > What you're advocating is the evil twin of censorship, namely forced speech. > > I can't see why... are you forced to package anything? So I can't package something because there's something I need to change (to make it Debian quality, for example) that I can't. That's very free. -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It's not a habit; it's cool; I feel alive. If you don't have it you're on the other side." - K's Choice (probably referring to the Internet) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
