Sam Powers wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 04:54:29PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit > > > > > closed automatically, but this way it is clear that the matter is out of > > > the (prospective) package maintainer's hands, or those of the WNPP > > > group, and in that of the FTP maintainers. > > > > it might be better to retitle it to make it look > > "ITP-uploaded: package - description" > > This might end up being more of a question, but what about some kind of > custom tag or something, perhaps tagging the ITP uploaded and then being > tagged installed once installed into the archive.. all this could be done > without continued human intervention, and provides both a place to store > information about rejects, and shows at what stage the package is at during > its lifespan.
New tags are an idea, but not a very visible one. My two cents... If the bug stayed with wnpp (as opposed to being reassigned to ftp.debian.org) I'd prefer a new title (e.g. ITP-uploaded). Archive maintainer who reject an upload could then retitle it to ITP-rejected and document why. This would make it easy to see on the wnpp page (provided these new catogories were added to the grouping). Peter
