On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 10:49:35PM -0500, Joseph Schlecht said: > I would like to change doc-html-w3's name to one that is more descriptive of > its current and potential contents. I think that the name of this package is > currently too narrow; besides HTML, indicated by the name, it also contains > CSS2, SMIL, XPATH and many other recommendations. What do you think?
As a normal user, when I see doc-html-w3, I think of html-formatted documents about Emacs' w3 web browser. I think a name change would be appropriate, IMHO. > Here are a couple of the names I've been kicking around: > a) doc-w3 (most general, my favorite; perhaps even doc-w3c) > b) doc-markup-w3 (but this name excludes style: CSS2, XSLT, etc) > c) doc-w3c-recommend > d) [your suggestion here] doc-w3c looks best to me, but any would work as long as it is -w3c instead of -w3. Kevin -- Kevin Kreamer FsckIt on openprojects.net
