> >Remove them.
>
> Move them to project/obsolete or some such.
Better would be to restructure the archive somehow and name things
correctly. I 'm still think something like this would be better:
stable/ /admin
/base
/comm
...
stable-extra/ /contrib
/non-free -> .../non-free
/obsolete
/experimental
/and other names which don't fit in the above
unstable/ /admin
/base
/comm
...
unstable-extra/ /contrib
/non-free -> .../non-free
/obsolete
/experimental
/and other names which don't fit in the above
This will leave us two main entries for all the packages in a distribution.
The problem with stable and unstable non-free/contrib packages will
disappear (they will be included in the releases approach we are following).
non-free and contrib will get the same status as the other sections like
base, admin and comm &c. This will make the structure far more consistent.
Erick
>
> --
> Christopher J. Fearnley | Linux/Internet Consulting
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | UNIX SIG Leader at PACS
> http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf | (Philadelphia Area Computer Society)
> ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf | Design Science Revolutionary
> "Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller | Explorer in Universe
>
>
>
