On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 02:21:11PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: > >> /opt/src/robert/XFS/xfsprogs-1.2.4/libxfs/xfs_inode.c:563: undefined > >> reference to `__fswab64' > >> /opt/src/robert/XFS/xfsprogs-1.2.4/libxfs/xfs_inode.c:563: relocation > >> truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24 __fswab64 > > Ignore "relocation truncated to fit", it is a spurious error message > caused by __fswab64 being undefined, __fswab64 is treated as 0 and a > ppc rel24 offset is not enough to represent 0 when the program is > loaded above address 2**23. > > As for why __fswab64 is undefined, try using -O2 instead of -O1. AFAIK > functions are not inlined at -O1. I;ll try that but hmm shouldn't compile also fail on f.ex. i386 ? on second thougt i now remeber that on i386 CCFLAGS haven't any -O option (and i tried this on PowerPC also with no luck... maybe compilator defaults with respect to optimisation are different?)
Should i file a bug on this? and bug agains what ? xfsprogs ? gcc ? -- Robert Ramiega | [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: _Jedi_ | Do not underestimate UIN: 13201047 | http://www.plukwa.net/ | the power of Source