Matt Zimmerman writes: > I think it makes as much sense as the existing task packages.
Many of which make no more sense than would task-emacs. > Perhaps task-devel-emacs would be the logical analogue. Why would someone who wants emacs so that he can read news and mail with gnus and work on his Web page install task-devel-emacs? That's obviously for people who want to hack on emacs. How about an ordinary meta-package named "emacs"? -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI