>Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org (Debian Development) > >Bruce Perens writes: >> >> Let's plan on having "shadow" be part of the base for 1.2 . We should thus >> have the default "login" be aware of it, etc. > >But the question remains, which login? The standard one patched, or the >shadow one, or both and the user decides?
Quick question (which may show some of my ignorance of the current linux shadow stuff): Will inclusion of the 'shadow' package as default interfere with the use of NIS passwd/group entries? Our installation is fairly dependent on NIS. -- Richard W Kaszeta Graduate Student/Sysadmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of MN, ME Dept http://www.menet.umn.edu/~kaszeta
