Guy Maor wrote:
>
> It is legal to explicitly call a destructor but rarely needed. It
> certainly makes no sense in this case, as the destructor will be called
> twice.
>
> The question, it seems, is what was the programmer trying to do?
Well I haven't got a clue on that one as I didn't write the code. But
I guess the more important question is that the crash did not seem to
be related to the destructor. That is, it crashes even without the call
to the destructor.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 1.1 is out! { http://www.debian.org/ }
A. B <=> True B. A <=> False
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or any other key sites
