On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:23:23PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:18:40AM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote: > > > if this is the case the solution is fixing broken mailers, many of > > > them are Free software so why have patches to support M-F-To not been > > > made? > > > > I'd like to see someone convince that M-F-To fix Pine. But I doubt you'll > > have an easy time getting Crispin to apply a patch. He won't even > > implement > > maildir, for christ sake, and patches for that have been around for over 2 > > years now. > > pine is a lost cause anyway. i was thinking of GNUs which seems to be > the other big offender of ignorage of M-F-To. (i am not sure if it > respects Mail-Copies-To: never i just started adding that.)
Actually, I'm pretty sure that Gnus respects M-F-To. The biggest offenders in that arena seem to be PINE and the GUI MUA's. > btw is it Mail-Copies-To: never or Mail-Copies-To: nobody ? i have > seen both which is correct? (assuming any MUA actually pays any > attention to this header anyway) Don't know, I don't use it. --Adam
