> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:42:22AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 04:03:45PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > > > Happy new year to everyone! > > > > > > > > gcc 2.95.3 appeared in Sid, but it hasn't been announced by the > > > > GCC steering committee yet. Is this some kind of early access > > > > version? > > > > > > It's based on the CVS branch, which is noted in the changelog if you had > > > bothered to read it. There's no such thing as "early access", this is > > > open source you know :) > > > > Ack!(tm). Not shades of rh7, I hope? I know that people using sid (like > > myself) are willingly sado-masochists, but a CVS GCC? > > Uh, GCC 2.95.3 CVS NOT 2.96 OR 2.97! Please be careful what you say. We > are talking about a stable release here, not a dripping wet development > snapshot.
So what was the CVS branch reference?
