On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:02:53PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > > > Adam Heath, please consider helping the gcc maintainer do some DBS > > > surgery, > > > because it is DBS that is keeping gcc from building. > > > > Branden, do some fucking research next time, before you place blame. Bug > > 80843 even proves it doesn't use dbs, or are you so dense as to not know > > what > > a dpatch file is? > > Bdale told me it was using DBS, or pasted some output that looked like DBS > to me. Also I thought I remembered you boasting months ago that DBS was > used in our XFree86, glibc, and gcc packages.
Bdale hates dbs, doesn't know what it is, so I don't trust his assement of the issue. I never said glibc nor gcc use dbs. They use a system like dbs, one I feel is incorrect(each .dpatch system includes code to apply the patch, which, I feel, is code duplication). ----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK---- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL++++ P+ L++++ !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS-- PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z? -----END GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ----BEGIN PGP INFO---- Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Finger Print | KeyID 67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E 63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG -----END PGP INFO-----
