Date: Sun, 29 Oct 95 10:33 MET From: "Bernd S. Brentrup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>/usr/share is "certainly" a better place. The Bison parser >skeletons are architechure-independent. I apologize for bad wording (english isn't my native language), what I meant to say is don't start cluttering /usr/share before it has been agreed upon. A lot of the stuff that's traditionally located in the /usr/lib subtree is architecture independent and should be moved under /usr/share. I agree completely. We should move everything at once. If we don't, we'll start looking like Slackware. ;) (I remember chuckling when I learned that Slackware included a /usr/share with one file in it...) Don't get me wrong--I'm all for /usr/share, but I agree with Bernd. This should be fixed until we move everything to /usr/share, which will be when the FSSTND tells us to.
