Are there solutions in the space of having glib2.0-0 continue to exist as a package depended on by glib2.0-0t64 or depending on the new library allowing you to replace the postrm? That might create a space in time where glib2.0-0.so does not exist, but we probably have more flexibility there than we do with essential packages.
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on gl... Simon McVittie
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice ... Christoph Berg
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting adv... Simon McVittie
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice ... Helmut Grohne
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting adv... Sam Hartman
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting adv... Stefano Rivera
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice ... Simon McVittie
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting adv... Simon McVittie
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting adv... Simon McVittie
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice ... Simon McVittie
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice ... Matthew Garrett
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting adv... Sam Hartman
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting... Simon McVittie
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Reques... Matthew Garrett
- Bug#1065170: marked as done (tech-ctte: Re... Debian Bug Tracking System

