On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 at 23:19, gregor herrmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:47:51 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 20:12, Simon McVittie <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I would very much prefer it if we can keep this conversation respectful, > […] > > > If you're frustrated, I understand that, but please can we take that > > > off-list? > > The perfect time to discuss "creative" alternative approaches was ~12 > > years ago, when everybody else was discussing where to move towards. > > It was perfectly acceptable to discuss it before the first CTTE vote. > > It was still ok-ish before the second CTTE vote. In August 2023: > […] > > That may well be true, but I think you missed smvc's point: > > > and hence interpreting attempts to propose yet another different and > > incompatible layout (only and solely for the benefit of the hopelessly > > broken dpkg tool) as sealioning is not disrespectful, on the contrary > > it is the most charitable interpretation possible. > > What Simon is asking for, in my interpretation, is some form of > civilised conversation; what you are delivering, as a direct reply to > Simon's request, causes yet another major pain in my back. > > Please stop and reconsider how you communicate with your peers.
And I think you missed mine: calling out sealioning as such is not "uncivilized". Far from it: after all this time, it is necessary.
