Re: Paul Wise > If you don't feel each decision deserves a mail, then I think there > should at least be a summary of decisions in a shorter time period than > the yearly bits mail. Either a more regular bits mail or via DevNews: > > https://wiki.debian.org/DeveloperNews
DevNews seems like a good place to post the "low profile" decisions. I still don't think we should post things like rename.ul do d-d-a - it's not of general interest to the project, and d-d-a would just further emphasize the implicit "we had to override the maintainer since they apparently did a bad job" part, which seems disproportional. Christoph
