On 25 March 2014 19:24, Tomasz Rybak <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dnia 2014-03-19, śro o godzinie 08:47 +0100, Anders Ingemann pisze: > [ cut ] > > > > > > > I think, (Anders?), that we could soon merge your code to the > > bootstrap-vz main branch, and that it could be updated after that when > > a Google Cloud SDK is available. > > Yep, code looks good *except* for the sleep statements, I'd like to > > avoid those, it really should be possible to do it without them. > > Maybe I'll try having a go at it myself > > They were needed on my (rather slow) machine. > Maybe they won't be needed on faster one; as soon as I have some time, > I'll test this - probably in the first half of the next week. > > Best regards. > > -- > Tomasz Rybak <[email protected]> GPG/PGP key ID: 2AD5 9860 > Fingerprint A481 824E 7DD3 9C0E C40A 488E C654 FB33 2AD5 9860 > http://member.acm.org/~tomaszrybak > > Alright. What gets me confused though, is that I thought kpartx -a was blocking rather than asynchronous (which it would be if a sleep call is really necessary). Aren't calls to the kernel that do things like mapping devices synchronous?
