Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I wonder whether we should think of gathering information about a >> potential "texlive-builddep" package. While there are reasons that >> collection-latexbase does not contain the EC fonts, most packages that >> build-depend on TeX will need them, and there might be similar cases. > > Or `texlive'? > Depends: texlive-fonts-recommended, texlive-latex-recommended, > texlive-latex-base > > which is reasonable.
Yes and no. texlive is a user-oriented, what I was thinking of is something Build-dep-oriented. It might be the same now, but not in the future. By the way, why did we drop context from texlive's Depends? I remember that I suggested to drop it from tetex-bin's depends, but not why we instead pulled it from the default texlive install. >> Or we just suggest maintainers to start with texlive-latex-recommended >> instead of -base? Or we make clean-chroot-builds mandatory? > > No chance. I wasn't really serious... Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
