-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:41:39PM +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > >> This software is available in experimental state. >> Who knows if 1.0.0. doesn't suffer of such critical bugs ? > >> It's too recent to be included in a Debian stable release, morever, have >> you experiencied any issue with this ntfs-3g version ? > >> I don't think so.... => Invalid. > >> Contact debian-release if you have some serious reason to request >> ntfs-3g 1.0.0. inclusion into etch. > > From my POV, the question is not whether ntfs-3g 1.0.0 should be included in > etch (it won't be), but whether the risk of this data loss is significant > enough that we should consider dropping ntfs-3g from etch altogether for the > sake of our users' data. Since ntfs-3g didn't ship with any previous > release, and has no reverse-dependencies in etch, it doesn't seem > unreasonable to drop it from the release, and that seems to be in keeping > with our policy of treating data loss bugs with the highest severity? > > Thanks,
Hi vorlon, I'm using ntfs-3g for ages, my corporate does too. Well, in fact, thousand of people uses ntfs-3g every days and nobody ever reported data corruption. As the software was still in experimental state when I packaged it, I added a debconf screen to warns users, however I thinks it's stupid to drop such a famous and usefull package (consider nobody reported a real bug on ntfs-3g since it's into the archive...). Regards. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGEr9+HNb/igTI5bsRAlq2AJ9aneexdd0vrSwDIEburXgbdKdkqACcDFx7 M21kTUBklZ5P8XU6jKdU+nA= =6c8O -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
