On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 06:14:51PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote: > On 3/13/07, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >"Hakan Ardo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi, > >> thanx for the patch. A better solution however would be to > >> build-depend on gcc-4.1-source in order not to duplicate the gcc > >> sourcecode. > >For sure this would be better. (I just didn't dare try this.) I don't > >know about the differences between the sources in gcc-4.1-source and in > >gcc-avr, so I cannot judge whether this would be acceptable for etch. > I see. Well it would mean moving from gcc 4.1.0 to 4.1.1, which is > only a small upstream bugfix upgrade... Nevertheless it's a significant rearchitecting of the package, so I'm not sure we'd want to see such a change made at this point of the release cycle. OTOH, I guess you'll know better than anyone if the resulting package works, and it would reduce the amount of code we have to carry in the archive... It's your call. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
