On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 14:02 +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Thijs, > > > > I really don't understand why this bug should be considered 'grave'. > Thank you for your interest, Steve. The bug has been patched anyway :-) > > Seems to be working, so I will proceed to ask for an sponsored upload > soon, along with some additional translations.
> Thijs, wanna sponsor that ? If this is either today or tomorrow I can sponsor you if you want, just drop me a note. After that I'm away for a couple of weeks. > In fact not, but a SEGFAULT is always a severe thing, so we'd better fix > it if possible. > I will be forwarding this patch upstream, so that it can be merged and > released along future releases. Thinking a bit further about it, you can debate the exact severity between 'important' and 'grave'. The imap server will be down at some moments, so imapproxy crashing on that seriously affects the robustness of the whole chain. In any case, good that this regression is fixed soon. I really think this should be fixed in Etch, since it's quite a regression since sarge. Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
