severity 412571 minor thanks On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:25:02PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > Attaching the license information to individual files is *not* required.
> I beg to differ. The two files are not written by the upstream author of > zatacka and imported from a different project. Neither the copyright > header of these two files do say that I can use the code freely, nor > does the documentation. Nor is that required. > > Do > > you have any reason to believe these files aren't being made available under > > the GPL, like the rest of the package? > They are not GPL, please check the upstream sources'0] (4-licensed: > LGPL <snip> Oh, well if you know this, then there is *definitely* no problem here. Works made available under the LGPL can also be distributed under the GPL with no further requirements, not even a requirement to mention the LGPL. The only bug left here is a dangling reference to a 'COPYING' file that isn't distributed. That's far from serious. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
