On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:25:42AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > > You say that while later on you claimed not to understand everything about > > the > > package (update script). Don't you have the impression that this judgement > > is > > also based on incomplete information on the package ?
> Of course, but how does that matter? The point is simply, if the > release managers intend to keep the etch-ignore pattern, What "pattern" are you talking about? > Therefore I'm asking the release team whether they still think that the > etch-ignore tag should stay. Yes, it should. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
