Your message dated Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:15:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line checkstyle: source code missing for emma.jar?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: checkstyle
Version: 4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: breaks DFSG #2
I just noticed that checkstyle_4.1.orig.tar.gz includes
checkstyle-src-4.1/lib/emma.jar
which according to
unzip -l checkstyle-src-4.1/lib/emma.jar
includes e.g.
com/vladium/emma/instr/InstrProcessorST.class
but I couldn't find source code for this file anywhere in debian. I'm
not sure but I think this violates DFSG #2 and at least
http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt says
"All content in main and contrib must meet the DFSG, both in
.debs and in the source (including the .orig.tar.gz)"
If the build process does not need emma.jar you probably could just
remove it? Otherwise I think you should include the sources as well.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.32sauna0
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.1+dfsg-1
There was a typo in debian/changelog so the the bug got not closed
automatically.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`- | 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B
--- End Message ---
