On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:53:53PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > Package: upgrade-reports > Severity: serious
> The piuparts run below: > /usr/sbin/piuparts -a -d sarge -d etch gnupg xawtv k3d-dev libcnumx0-dev > mozilla-opensc xmms-coverviewer makeself koffice-i18n-nn kview libmcardplugin > gij-3.4 gimp-dimage-color libast2-dev libaal-dev caudium-dev libcvsservice0 > tex-guy linuxdoc-tools-latex snort-common multipath-tools isic libpam-pwdfile > libotr1-dev libglib2-ruby haskelldb-bin cyrus21-imapd bsign > scalapack-lam-test pyching freeswan dict-freedict-spa-eng xfaces > libtie-cache-perl zope2.7-mimetypesregistry libdmsocket-0.32.5-0-dev > attal-themes-medieval kde-i18n-srlatin dircproxy pica glimmer kappfinder > kde-i18n-eu 9menu selflinux-pdf libgtksourceview-doc Is there a smaller minimal set of packages that can be used to reproduce the problem? > dpkg: python2.3: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you > request: > python2.3-xml depends on python2.3. > python depends on python2.3 (>= 2.3.4-18). > zope2.7 depends on python2.3 (>= 2.3.2). > (Reading database ... 47589 files and directories currently > installed.) > Removing python2.3 ... This looks like an apt bug to me (and isn't the first time I've seen it). If we know zope2.7 is going to be removed in addition to python2.3, why is zope2.7 not removed first, avoiding the need to --force-depends? Does piuparts use apt-get or aptitude in its upgrade test, and does that make a difference in the outcome? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
