Hi all, I apologize for my late reply.
I'm in work about atokx package now. It is commercial software as you know, and it's very old. And, I'd like to change package structure to use debian version iiimf-server instead of atokx commercial archive. (It is in experimental) Because each of them use the same port. I'm trying to create and test new package but it does not work correctly yet. So, please wait a few days to try it. I'd like to keep atokx into debian archive and add it to etch. But..., atokx depends on iiimf-server but it is not in etch, only in unstable. Hmm... Anyway, I will upload new atokx package to unsable in a few days. Thank you, 2007/1/26, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi all Mark wrote: > I've noticed the rc bug on atokx, which is quite old. You don't seem > to care much about the package nowadays, and popcon reports that noone > uses it anyway. Perhaps we should remove it from the archive? atokx has already been removed from testing. Can we file a RFR now? Or is the version in experimental any better? Why is it marked as dangerous in the changelog? I mean, it is just a installer for commercial software. How can this be a dangerous version? Is this software still relevant? What are the dangers? Taku, can you ellaborate? -- ยท''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution : :' : -- Emma Goldman `. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
-- Taku YASUI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
