Frank Küster: > Well, in this case this bug may not be a "source is missing" RC bug, but > it's still a "license violation" RC bug. Earlier in this bug Georg Baum > said that the original pfb fonts are under the LPPL, but this is wrong - > most are under an individual unnamed license. Part of it is quoted > above and requires to remove the AMS copyright notice from derivative > versions, which has not been done with the latex-xft-fonts package.
OK, I will fix this then. > Moreover, I think even the "source is missing" issue is still a bug, > even if not RC. The copyright file states that the pfb files have been > "hinted and touched up with FontLab v.3.0c". Hinting and other changes > can also be scripted, and it would be a nice thing to do that automated > with fontforge, starting from the pfb files. I would regard this as > wishlist, or minor, but I don't think this part of the bug should be > closed. Right. -- Pelle
