On Saturday 13 January 2007 13:50, Frans Pop wrote:
> The testcase included in the busybox testsuite seems to work only by
> accident as it is a numeric sort and the last field to be sorted is the
> only numerical data in each line.

It turns out the testcase based on the D-I situation is broken in two 
respects:
- The testing function wants the _expected output_ as its 3rd parameter
  and the _input_ as the 5th parameter.
  In testsuite/sort.tests these are reversed.
- If I run that test with GNU 'sort' (from my regular Etch system), the
  sort only works correctly if I sort with -k5, not -k4.
  This means that GNU 'sort' _does_ count the empty field before the
  leading separator (as also originally reported by Joey).

Attached an extra set of testcases, with the corrected D-I case and a full 
set of cases for sorting with and without leading delimiter.
These all PASS if I use GNU sort.

Cheers,
FJP

testing "sort key edge case with -t" "sort -n -k5 -t/" \
"/usr/lib/finish-install.d/1
/usr/lib/prebaseconfig.d/2
/usr/lib/finish-install.d/4
/usr/lib/prebaseconfig.d/6
" "" "/usr/lib/finish-install.d/1
/usr/lib/finish-install.d/4
/usr/lib/prebaseconfig.d/2
/usr/lib/prebaseconfig.d/6
"

testing "sort key with delimiter, field 1" "sort -k1 -t/" \
"a/a/b
a/c/a
b/b/c
" "" "a/c/a
b/b/c
a/a/b
"

testing "sort key with delimiter, field 2" "sort -k2 -t/" \
"a/a/b
b/b/c
a/c/a
" "" "a/c/a
b/b/c
a/a/b
"

testing "sort key with delimiter, field 3" "sort -k3 -t/" \
"a/c/a
a/a/b
b/b/c
" "" "a/c/a
b/b/c
a/a/b
"

testing "sort key with leading delimiter, field 1" "sort -k1 -t/" \
"/a/a/b
/a/c/a
/b/b/c
" "" "/a/c/a
/b/b/c
/a/a/b
"

testing "sort key with leading delimiter, field 2" "sort -k2 -t/" \
"/a/a/b
/a/c/a
/b/b/c
" "" "/a/c/a
/b/b/c
/a/a/b
"

testing "sort key with leading delimiter, field 3" "sort -k3 -t/" \
"/a/a/b
/b/b/c
/a/c/a
" "" "/a/c/a
/b/b/c
/a/a/b
"

testing "sort key with leading delimiter, field 4" "sort -k4 -t/" \
"/a/c/a
/a/a/b
/b/b/c
" "" "/a/c/a
/b/b/c
/a/a/b
"

Attachment: pgpEQNK2vqnWO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to