On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:24:13AM -0600, Adam Majer wrote: > > While direct upgrades from sarge to lenny won't be supported, it would be > > more accurate to just leave the Conflicts: in (or change it to Breaks:) > > because the problem won't have disappeared, it'll just be less likely to be > > encountered. (Well, maybe ruby1.8 will be deprecated by lenny, I guess > > that's one possibility. :)
> I'm not sure about the Breaks. rails does not break the libdeve-logger, > libdevel-logger breaks rails and libdevel-logger is not part of Debian > after Sarge. Or does Breaks mean that > Package: A > Breaks: B > Package: B > then this indicates that package A is broken by B? Hmm, good point, I'm not sure that Breaks is symmetric. So don't mind me. :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
