Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:17:02 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403322: fixed in flashrom 0.0+r2526-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: flashrom
Version: 0.0+r2526-1
Severity: serious

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
At 1166224091 time_t, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Automatic build of flashrom_0.0+r2526-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98
> Build started at 20061216-0007
> ******************************************************************************
...
> /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules reverse-config
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/flashrom-0.0+r2526'
> make[1]: Nothing to be done for `reverse-config'.
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/flashrom-0.0+r2526'
> if [ "debian/stamp-patched" = "reverse-patches" ]; then rm -f 
> debian/stamp-patched; fi
> patches: debian/patches/20_makefile_ldflags.patch 
> debian/patches/30_lbtable.patch debian/patches/40_linuxbios_tables.patch
> Trying patch debian/patches/20_makefile_ldflags.patch at level 1 ... 0 ... 
> success.
> Trying patch debian/patches/30_lbtable.patch at level 1 ... 0 ... success.
> Trying patch debian/patches/40_linuxbios_tables.patch at level 1 ... 0 ... 
> success.
> if [ "debian/stamp-patched" != "reverse-patches" ]; then touch 
> debian/stamp-patched; fi
> if [ "debian/stamp-patched" != "reverse-patches" ] ; then \
>               /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules update-config ; \
>       fi
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/flashrom-0.0+r2526'
> make[1]: Nothing to be done for `update-config'.
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/flashrom-0.0+r2526'
> /usr/bin/make  -C . CFLAGS="-g -Wall -O2 -DDISABLE_DOC" CXXFLAGS="-g -Wall 
> -O2 -DDISABLE_DOC" CPPFLAGS="" LDFLAGS=""  
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/flashrom-0.0+r2526'
> 
> Checking for pciutils... not found.
> 
> Please install pciutils and pciutils-devel.
> See README for more information.
> 
> make[1]: *** [pciutils] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/flashrom-0.0+r2526'
> make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2
> ******************************************************************************
> Build finished at 20061216-0008
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: flashrom
Source-Version: 0.0+r2526-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
flashrom, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

flashrom_0.0+r2526-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/flashrom/flashrom_0.0+r2526-2.diff.gz
flashrom_0.0+r2526-2.dsc
  to pool/main/f/flashrom/flashrom_0.0+r2526-2.dsc
flashrom_0.0+r2526-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/flashrom/flashrom_0.0+r2526-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated flashrom package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:36:04 +0100
Source: flashrom
Binary: flashrom
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0+r2526-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 flashrom   - Universal flash programming utility
Closes: 403322
Changes: 
 flashrom (0.0+r2526-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Add missing build dependency on zlib1g-dev (Closes: #403322).
     Thanks Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and
     Alex de Oliveira Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
   * Standards-Version: 3.7.2.2 (no changes required).
Files: 
 a568a09e8bc47674d049a849fecf2fc7 601 electronics extra flashrom_0.0+r2526-2.dsc
 16a36aae397a604c36cb86773d885408 5087 electronics extra 
flashrom_0.0+r2526-2.diff.gz
 5dbf717ddd6ab9bc30d3afc6746d3c68 31140 electronics extra 
flashrom_0.0+r2526-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFh7T0XdVoV3jWIbQRAkXSAKCh928/AvLR00KQiaPLs9bNLpB1pgCfQE4X
3RUQZOUgh+4D2kuxKlcAiZ0=
=CZCT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to