Hi Kurt! You wrote:
> The best thing I can think of right now is that if it starts and stops > on a 2048 sector boundery (that's not also the normal (63) boundery?) > and the fs is ntfs 3.1, we use 2048, else the normal value. Which looks > so ugly. > > I wonder how vista does this itself. I don't think Vista has any problem with non-2048 sector boundaries havne't tried it though). The problem here seems to be that the partition boundary is changed without changing/moving the fs to reflect the new partition size. Effectively, the first 2048-63 sectors of the partition will be random data, which is confusing Vista (and rightly so, I guess). -- Kind regards, +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | |----------------------------| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
