On 2006-12-06 10:21:38 -0500 Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ufraw is the only package, which I don't maintain which also has a
dependancy on exiv2 and they are Cc:ed on this email.
Thanks for CC:ing me.
I can reupload ufraw if necessary. But as long as there are no API
changes in exiv2, ufraw should be fine with just a binNMU, so it
shouldn't be a problem.
d-release, let me know if you'd prefer if I reupload ufraw, or if it's
better to just do a binNMU.
--
Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
