--- Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > 2006 m. gruodis 2 d., ðeðtadienis 18:59, Tom McCabe > raðë: > > Unreproducible? You didn't even use the same > version > > of Firefox I have! > Yes, because that firefox is irrelevant. It can't be > shipped with etch as Mike > said due to another serious bug (#354622).
Excellent, so then the bug can be closed as soon as Etch is updated. It doesn't have anything to do with reproducability. > > I run Etch. Iceweasel is not in Etch. Firefox > version > > 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.7-2 is, and so therefore any bug in > > Firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.7-2 is a bug in Etch until > Etch > > is updated. > Yes, you run etch, but do you realize that etch has > not been released yet? Of course. > So > please *help* maintainers to determine the cause of > the bug. Maybe it's > flashplugin-nonfree bug and firefox has nothing to > do with it? So: > > 1) remove flashplugin and test > 2) if unsuccessful, upgrade to iceweasel and test > (without flashplugin) > 3) if 2) was successful, install flashplugin from > unstable and test (enjoy). > > This way you can actually help to improve quality of > etch even if the problem > involves flashplugin (non-free software). > Ah, okay. Upgrading the flash plugin to the 9.0.21.78.3 version fixes it, so the bug should be transferred to that package. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Have a burning question? Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
