On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 03:11:16PM +0100, Frederik Wagner wrote: > Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6 > Version: 2.6.17-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: no longer builds from source
> The source package depends on the 'squashfs-source' and 'unionfs-source' > package, which are not available in etch. > Looking at packages.debian.org: 'squashfs-source' is only available in > unstable and 'unionfs-source' only in stable and unstable, but _not_ > testing! > As far as I remember, by removing all the relevant rules for building > the unionfs/squasfs related modules-packages, the > 'redhat-cluster-modules' and 'spca5xx-modules' are building fine (at > least on amd64). So here's the score: unionfs and squashfs were both removed from testing due to release-critical bugs. The bugs in both packages have been fixed, so they should be able to get back into testing again. Both packages are out-of-date on arm because the module metapackages they previously generated are now built *by* linux-modules-extra-2.6, and l-m-e-2.6 has not yet built successfully on arm. Previously, l-m-e-2.6 didn't build on arm because of an internal consistency failure when compiling squashfs. Now, it's impossible to check whether this bug is still present on arm, because l-m-e-2.6 now has an unsatisfiable build-dependency in unstable on linux-support-2.6.18-1. So l-m-e-2.6 needs to be uploaded with a fixed build-dependency before we can even *try* to see whether squashfs needs further fixes on arm for etch. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
