Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think it is not correct to use emacs21 | emacsen in the > Build-Depends-Indep field, since, AFIK, the xemacs packages provide > emacsen but not the /usr/bin/emacs alternative. It would be better > to use emacs21 | emacs22 | emacs-snapshot instead (the latter works, > I just verified it). > > The package will still FTBFS if the system administrator has > manually set the emacs alternative to some not-really-Emacs-editor > as zile or e3, but that's probably too weird to bother about.
Yuck. Still, I guess the only real alternative would be to use some sort of automake script to figure out where a suitable Emacs (or XEmacs) binary is, and I don't really want to complicate my build system. I'll have to give it some thought. -- Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/ Interests: Emacs Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net /` |\ | | | Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, Planner, ErBot, DVC |_] | \| |_| Reclaim your digital rights by eliminating DRM. See http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm for details.
pgp20Y5Ppv1BN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
