On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > > Perhaps the maintainer should revert this NMU with the next upload, I
> > > don't know whether Tuukka's patch is harmless.
> >
> > It's also fairly easy to see that the patch is harmless, because timeout
> > only affects the time select waits, and we wait the remaining time in
> > the following lines of URLFetch.py anyway, before the next run.
>
> Sorry, I didn't mean to offend you. I'm very grateful for what you did.
> I meant that if really the bug was in python-adns (which is not the
> case), [maybe] the patch should be reverted.
>
> Also, it's not easy for me to judge as my Python knowledge is zero.
No harm done, I just wanted to explain the thinking behind the patch.
Thank you for the report so we finally got this long-standing issue fixed,
and thank you to Sesse for the quick upload.
--
-- Trying to catch me? Just follow up my Electric Fingerprints
-- To help you: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.iki.fi/Tuukka.Hastrup/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
