Your message dated Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:09:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Please provide a s390 binary package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: vnstat
Version: 1.4-4
Severity: serious
The source package vnstat is arch-any and it builds fine on
s390. Therefore, I see no reason for not providing a s390 binary
package. This is a RC bug, because it downgrades the quality of the
release for this package.
The post [1] asks the porters to queue the package on a s390
auto-builder.
Cheers,
[1] <http://lists.debian.org/debian-s390/2006/11/msg00008.html>
--
.''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :' :
`. `'` Free Software Developer
`- Unix Sys & Net Admin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 01:27:49AM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> The source package vnstat is arch-any and it builds fine on
> s390. Therefore, I see no reason for not providing a s390 binary
> package. This is a RC bug, because it downgrades the quality of the
> release for this package.
Aurélien Jarno has built and uploaded a s390 binary package. Many
thanks to him! ;)
Cheers,
--
.''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :' :
`. `'` Free Software Developer
`- Unix Sys & Net Admin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
