On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:03:36PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Sorry, it didn't occur to me that you would feel strongly about being > credited here. This doesn't mean that I don't appreciate your work, it just > means (in my case) that I didn't use your patch directly, but re-derived it > after testing on alpha. FWIW, the maintainer's upload also doesn't appear > to credit you; as I don't intend to re-NMU just to fix the crediting, you > might ask the maintainer to make this change in his next version.
I bear no grudge against you for this. It is just a trivial workaround anyway, the real bug being in gcc (#394630). Also, my wording may have been too strong. I have been told that I am not qualified to even be accepted in NM (not being visible on the BTS for instance), so I was a bit blood-headed when I looked at the changelog entry. :) Cheers, -- .''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME : :' : `. `'` Free Software Developer `- Unix Sys & Net Admin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
