On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 13:08 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > However, I'm downgrading the severity of this bug. I've taken a look at > the justification you reference, and that article mentions only a > "should". Apart from the formal argument, I do not believe that this > violation makes the package in any way unsuitable for release.
The submitter's email bounces, but if you read this: I'm of course open to arguments why this should be release critical. Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
