Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:11:29 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392950: fixed in latex209 25.mar.1992-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: latex209-bin
Version: 25.mar.1992-7
Severity: serious

Hello Masatoshi,

There is an error when attempting to purge latex209-bin:
  Removing latex209-bin ...
  Purging configuration files for latex209-bin ...
  /var/lib/dpkg/info/latex209-bin.postrm: line 23: update-fmtutil: command not 
found
  dpkg: error processing latex209-bin (--purge):
   subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127

The postrm script cannot rely on update-fmtutil to be available when purging.

See Policy 7.2:
  Note, however, that the `postrm' cannot rely on any non-essential packages to
  be present during the `purge' phase.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: latex209
Source-Version: 25.mar.1992-10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
latex209, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

latex209-base_25.mar.1992-10_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/latex209/latex209-base_25.mar.1992-10_all.deb
latex209-bin_25.mar.1992-10_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/latex209/latex209-bin_25.mar.1992-10_all.deb
latex209-src_25.mar.1992-10_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/latex209/latex209-src_25.mar.1992-10_all.deb
latex209_25.mar.1992-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/latex209/latex209_25.mar.1992-10.diff.gz
latex209_25.mar.1992-10.dsc
  to pool/main/l/latex209/latex209_25.mar.1992-10.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated latex209 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:44:49 +0900
Source: latex209
Binary: latex209-src latex209-base latex209-bin
Architecture: source all
Version: 25.mar.1992-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 latex209-base - macro files of LaTeX 2.09 25-mar-1992 version
 latex209-bin - latex209 command for LaTeX 2.09 25-mar-1992 version
 latex209-src - source files of macros of LaTeX 2.09 25-mar-1992 version
Closes: 392950
Changes: 
 latex209 (25.mar.1992-10) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Check the existence of mktexlsr, update-texmf, and update-fmtutil
     before calling them in maintainer scripts. (Closes: #392950)
Files: 
 78ae2dd35fc46258abc96c68d4ac5c30 625 tex optional latex209_25.mar.1992-10.dsc
 7ac4503dab4835e77e7b4948bd8518bb 4213 tex optional 
latex209_25.mar.1992-10.diff.gz
 d6ceee4563d8354e626d7d365288cea6 205864 tex optional 
latex209-base_25.mar.1992-10_all.deb
 c3aa8271bd16372adfdc0c20fdb7c6a4 4272 tex optional 
latex209-bin_25.mar.1992-10_all.deb
 bc0cc17e3e5a7ee5c924b469064e79db 65710 tex optional 
latex209-src_25.mar.1992-10_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFM/Xuy2+jQOcHWlQRAnM+AJ4jjHd7ljdWVNAKdg7h15XxzofHPwCff97v
AYo8tupxmGi2zPU22OiqvgY=
=3VqJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to