Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about the Nettle manual? That seems to be appropriate, too.
No, it's inconvenient to use a file that is subject to updates (for every update to the file, the testcase would have to be updated as well, which kind-of defeats the idea of automatic regression testing). That's why I liked using an RFC; they are never updated after publication. And using a fixed outdated version of the nettle manual seems silly. It would be better to shop around at project gutenberg. /Niels
