On 10/16/06, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: erlang
Version: 1:11.b.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package contains the following files from the
IETF under non-free license terms:
Yes, These are clearly nonfree docs, and the package will be fixed
shortly. I would like
to ask a question though: If the next upstream version will also
include these docs
should we keep .dfsg suffix after repackaging tarball or not? For now
it's nesessary to
distinguish two tarballs.
otp_src_R11B-1/lib/megaco/doc/standard/draft-ietf-megaco-h248v2-04.txt
otp_src_R11B-1/lib/megaco/doc/standard/rfc2327.txt
otp_src_R11B-1/lib/megaco/doc/standard/rfc3525.txt
otp_src_R11B-1/lib/megaco/doc/standard/rfc3266.txt
otp_src_R11B-1/lib/ssh/doc/standard/draft-ietf-secsh-architecture-15.txt
otp_src_R11B-1/lib/ssh/doc/standard/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-02.txt
otp_src_R11B-1/lib/ssh/doc/standard/draft-ietf-secsh-userauth-18.txt
otp_src_R11B-1/lib/ssh/doc/standard/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-03.txt
otp_src_R11B-1/lib/ssh/doc/standard/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-04.txt
otp_src_R11B-1/lib/ssh/doc/standard/draft-ietf-secsh-transport-17.txt
otp_src_R11B-1/lib/ssh/doc/standard/draft-ietf-secsh-connect-18.txt
--
Sergei Golovan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
